A summary of RSSB's findings with regard to the Hatfield derailment.
This document was published on 16th November 2004 by Railway Safety & Standards Board.
It was written by Railway Safety & Standards Board.
This item is linked to the Accident at Hatfield on 17th October 2000
The original document format was HTML, and comprised 3 pages.
This document is © Railway Safety & Standards Board.
"The report found that the immediate cause of the accident was due to the fracture and subsequent fragmentation of the high rail over a 35 metre
length due to substantial transverse fatigue defects in the rail head. It states that these defects had their origins in gauge corner cracks, a form
of rolling contact fatigue, which had developed on the rail surface.
The report points to a number of underlying causes which led to the accident:
An incomplete appreciation of the risks presented by gauge corner cracking, and the consequent failure to develop and disseminate comprehensive instructions on its identification and the control measures required.
A failure to manage and execute a competent visual inspection regime, and to manage the ultrasonic inspections so as to identify the true condition of the high rail at the Welham Curve, and to take appropriate action to maintain the line.
An inadequate management of the contracts relating to the maintenance and renewal of the track asset.
The failure to ensure the completion of the urgent proposal to rerail Welham Curve as a result of a lack of effective project management, and a failure to take account of the potential risks of delay.
The failure to act on the findings of audit reports relating to a lack of adequate knowledge of the track asset. "
15th October 1999
Private Eye No. 987 - Railtrack Disaster - Millions Lost
20th October 2000
Train Derailment At Hatfield: First HSE Interim Report
3rd November 2000
Private Eye No. 1014 - Railtrack Boss Spells It Out
23rd January 2001
Train Derailment At Hatfield: Second HSE Interim Report
30th July 2001
DfT Notes of July 25th 2001 Meeting with Railtrack
31st July 2001
Email - Re: Renewco
23rd August 2001
Executive Summary: The Treatment of Debt and Equity
29th August 2001
Email - re: Ariel
29th August 2001
Email - Re: Ariel
4th September 2001
Email - Re: Chx, PM, Byers trilateral on railways
14th September 2001
Email - Ariel treatment of lenders
16th September 2001
Email - Re: Update on Railtrack
18th September 2001
Email - Draft Minute
19th September 2001
Railtrack - Speaking Note
19th September 2001
Railtrack - Speaking Note (annotated)
20th September 2001
Email - Renewco Handling
21st September 2001
Email - NGCL - classification issues
24th September 2001
Treatment of Railtrack Debt And Shareholders
26th September 2001
Railtrack: Project Ariel
2nd October 2001
Email: Ariel Update
6th October 2001
Telephone note between Rail Regulator and Railtrack PLC
7th October 2001
DTLR Press Release 07.10.2001
10th October 2001
Note of meeting between Rail Regulator and DfT's Permanent Secretary
11th October 2001
DTLR Press Release 11.10.2001
23rd October 2001
DTLR Press Release 23.10.2001
31st October 2001
DTLR Press Release 31.10.2001
8th November 2001
Notes of Regulator's Meeting 7 November 2001
8th March 2002
Private Eye No. 1049 - Byers Confesses
16th November 2004
Hatfield Report and Recommendations
Does the franchise model just need technical changes or would a concession system be better?
or just view the results
Join our 2007 other members and sign up to receive the RA newsletter, with links to all new documents and other site news...
Please consider donating to help with our running costs.