You are in RA » Document Archive » Accident at Norton Bridge on 16th October 2003 » Norton Bridge Report and Recommendations

view document PDF (0.1Mb download)Norton Bridge Report and Recommendations

Document Summary

The report into the collision between two freight trains at Norton Bridge in 2003.

This document was published in 2004 by Railway Safety & Standards Board.

It was written by Railway Safety & Standards Board.


This item is linked to the Accident at Norton Bridge on 16th October 2003


The original document format was HTML, and comprised 2 pages.The original document can be found here.

This document was kindly sourced from Railway Safety & Standards Board and is in our Accident reports collection. It was added to the Archive on 18th August 2006.

Copyright Information

This document is © Railway Safety & Standards Board.

"Bridge area as part of the West Coast Route Modernisation Project and, at the time of the incident, a major blockade of lines between Norton Bridge and Crewe was underway.

Because of this blockade, only one of the four tracks between Norton Bridge and Crewe was open to traffic. However, a short emergency possession of the line of approximately 20 minutes had to be taken around 0300 hrs. The requirement was for trains to be detained at Norton Bridge awaiting line clearance. The possession was later extended to an hour.

The signals were used to stop trains and freight train A was brought to a stand at approximately 0308 hrs and its driver (A) advised of the situation. Almost immediately, the signaller heard a very loud bang. Driver A had been standing in the doorway and was making his way back to his seat when he experienced a violent shunt forward which threw him off balance.

The driver of train B, which had collided with the rear of train A, was physically unhurt in the incident, but had to be released from his cab by the fire service. He advised the Norton Bridge signaller of the incident, and the signal aspects he believed he had received."

Have Your Say

Does the franchise model just need technical changes or would a concession system be better?

or just view the results

Mailing List

Join our 1898 other members and sign up to receive the RA newsletter, with links to all new documents and other site news...

See how our privacy policy protects your address.

Donate

Please consider donating to help with our running costs.

Back to top