This act introduced mandated standard gauges of 4 feet 8½ inches for Britain, and 5 feet 3 inches for Ireland; thus signalling the beginning of the end for Brunel's broad gauge network.
Please note that this Act is presented in its original form as passed. This Act may have been amended by subsequent legislation. For details of amendments please see the UK Statute Law Database at www.statutelaw.gov.uk.
This document was published on 18th August 1846 by Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
It was written by Her Majesty's Government.
The original document format was Paper, and comprised 3 pages.
This document was kindly sourced from Parliamentary Archives and is in our Primary legislation collection. It was added to the Archive on 19th September 2006.
This document is Crown Copyright, and is subject to the terms governing the reproduction of crown copyright material. Depending on the status and age of the original document, you may need an OPSI click-use license if you wish to reproduce this material, and other restrictions may apply. Please see this explanation for further details.
"WHEREAS it is expedient to define the Gauge on which Railways shall be constructed: Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty That after the passing of this Act it shall not be lawful to construct any Railway for the Conveyance of Passengers on any Gauge other than Four Feet Eight Inches and Half an Inch in Great Britain, and Five Feet Three Inches in Ireland: Provided always, that nothing herein-before contained shall be deemed to forbid the Maintenance and Repair of any Railway constructed before the passing of this Act on any Gauge other than those herein-before specified, or to forbid the laying of new Rails on the same Gauge on which such Railway is constructed within the Limits of Deviation authorized by the several Acts under the Authority of which such Railways are severally constructed."
18th August 1846
Gauge of Railways Act
1st September 1892
Facsimile Letter to Persons Engaged in Conversion of Gauge
Does the franchise model just need technical changes or would a concession system be better?
or just view the results
Join our 1663 other members and sign up to receive the RA newsletter, with links to all new documents and other site news...
See how our privacy policy protects your address.
Please consider donating to help with our running costs.